[bazooka joe]

I'm trying to figure out why ESPN.com didn't choose to highlight the Pujols trade and chose instead to highlight the Chris Paul trade and then no-trade instead. I'm thinking ESPN was paid off...

Hmm, where to begin?

1. Pujols didnt get traded

2. I dont know if you actually watched ESPN this morning, but they were constantly talking about Pujols.

3. The Chris Paul trade veto has never happened before in the history of the NBA(unless im mistaken), so its not like they are covering LeBron playing wiffle ball or something.

4. Who are you trying to imply paid off ESPN? I dont even know where you were trying to go with this.