[gangstippie]

Here are the cards:

2000 Score Scorecard Tom Brady 8.5 - 8.5,8,8.5,8.5
2000 Bowman Tom Brady 8 - 9.5,7.5,9.5,9
2000 Pacific Tom Brady 8.5 - 9.5,8,9.5,9.5
2009 Ultimate Drew Brees 8.5 - 9.5,8.5,9,8.5
2009 Contenders Mark Sanchez 8 - 9.5,8,8,9.5
2007 SP Authentic Drew Brees 8.5 - 9.5,8,9,9.5
2010 Limited Material Monikers Barry Sanders 8.5 - 9.5,8,8.5,9.5
2010 Limited Monikers Adrian Peterson 8.5 - 9.5,8,9,9.5

Subs are centering, corners, edges, surface.

The Sanchez and the AP are the most disappointing. The Sanchez is the worst one ever submitted. I'm ok with the Bradys, but would've loved to see some 9s.

---

even for slightly older cards, I wont buy/trade for a graded 8...maybe not even an 8.5, unless they were of studs from 1980's and earlier when cards were expected to be of poorer quality. If the are autographed cards for the PC, then I'm happy with that, just to get the autograph protected.

I agree. My cards aren't old. Most were pulled by me. I just didn't think the corners were that bad on them.

---

Ya I'm typically not a fan of anything lower and a 9, lots of times it also depends on the Population report of each card. Also don't count yourself out on that 9 Bowman Brady, I don't think it's set in stone till he opens and he sees which is which. As I recall I think I had one so-so corner, which is why I am not so sure.

We'll see, but the corner grades are pretty consistent with my others. It's like I don't know how the sleeve them and peel them apart trying to put them in. lol