[Marinoisking]

I was just going through some older becketts and of course looked back at the "super collector" section...I was just wondering what you think the qualifications should be to get in there...I raise this question because the one collection was not that impressive. IM not going to name which one it was but it didnt involve this sport and there main attribute was just having a bunch of the same card...thats cool and all but they didnt have a big variety. Which thats what I think it should be about...I feel it should be about who has the highest percentage of either one section of a player...like say you have every dan marino base card...which is probably in the thousands...that to me would be an accomplishment. Or maybe you go after all the true rookies of a player...or in my case go after every card that isnt a 1/1. Becuase thats just impossible in my opinion. I think there are too many collections that get praised that shouldnt...Like ive seen some incredible collections of people who post here and ive never seen them in the mag and they should be!

I think dan has 6000+ I didnt do the math bc I really dont do the multi card thing unless its just sweet or an auto lol

I dont have a super collection of anything....yet. lol

I have a TON of Marino...Ton of Manning...and my Alstott numbers are up there...as far Brian Hartline...the number of cards I have isnt super impressive...but the percentage is really high

But the top 2 of those guys ( marino and manning) just the insane prices on their cards...and the sheer number of people that chase them...and even people that dont collect them always want a few nice cards of them....I think being deemed a supercollector should almost be prorated.