Posts: 715
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2008
02-22-2014, 03:27 PM
1996 Select Certified help please
I received this card in a trade, and I'm trying to identify it...Beckett has the mirror red /90, but the mirror reds from what I see are not serial numbered and they say mirror red on the back.
The only thing I could find on ebay is this auction where on the back you can see it says mirror red.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/FRANK-SANDERS-70...2a3768cdbb
Does anybody have any info about this at all? Thanks!
Posts: 1,163
Threads: 13
Joined: Jul 2001
02-22-2014, 04:10 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
1996 Select Certified Red #33
1996 Select Certified Mirror Red #33
1996 Select Certified Mirror Red Premium Stock #33
Posts: 616
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2005
02-22-2014, 04:15 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
Almost for certain what you got there is the Red version parallel. Reportedly 2,000 of those were created, while 50 were for the Mirror Red and 20 for the Premium Stock Mirror Red.
Posts: 1,677
Threads: 53
Joined: Mar 2011
02-22-2014, 05:12 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
The mirror blues were /50. The mirror reds were /90. Op has a base red /2000. The mirror reds have a silver top corner and refractor finish to the entire card.
Trying to finish these sets:
1999 Upper Deck Strike Force Quantum /100
2000 Score Complete Players Green/ Blue
2000 Leaf Piece of the Game Preview 4th Down Isaac Bruce
2008 Premier NFL Equipment /25 John Elway
Let me know if you have any available.
Posts: 616
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2005
02-22-2014, 05:54 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
(02-22-2014, 05:12 PM)Marinocollector Wrote: The mirror blues were /50. The mirror reds were /90. Op has a base red /2000. The mirror reds have a silver top corner and refractor finish to the entire card.
You are right. It is /90 not /50 for the Mirror Reds, my bad.
Posts: 1,677
Threads: 53
Joined: Mar 2011
02-22-2014, 06:16 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
(02-22-2014, 05:54 PM)nittany13 Wrote: You are right. It is /90 not /50 for the Mirror Reds, my bad.
Its all good. So much misinformation with this older cards, I like to keep things straight. LOL.
Trying to finish these sets:
1999 Upper Deck Strike Force Quantum /100
2000 Score Complete Players Green/ Blue
2000 Leaf Piece of the Game Preview 4th Down Isaac Bruce
2008 Premier NFL Equipment /25 John Elway
Let me know if you have any available.
Posts: 274
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2009
02-22-2014, 06:39 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
Definitely the basic red version and there are no actual serial numbers on any 96 select certified cards, only reported print runs... but they're pretty accurate.
#1 on the PSA Registry Marino Master set
* Always buying ANY reasonably priced Marino card(s) I don't already have *
-- WANT LIST LINK --
Posts: 715
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2008
02-22-2014, 07:52 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
Thank you guys!
Posts: 6,047
Threads: 182
Joined: Apr 2009
02-24-2014, 06:03 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
I am the one who mis marked the card for trade. I will make up the difference of trade value. I thought it was mirror red and marked it as such. When we talked about the card in question I wasnt sure what to make of it. So with you all concenus I will try to make up the differnce the best way I can.
My apologies for mismarking the card. I will see what I have in Giants or I will go to my LCS this weekend. I made a mistake and I want to make it right in all accounts
Posts: 715
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2008
02-25-2014, 02:21 PM
RE: 1996 Select Certified help please
(02-24-2014, 06:03 PM)waynetalger Wrote: I am the one who mis marked the card for trade. I will make up the difference of trade value. I thought it was mirror red and marked it as such. When we talked about the card in question I wasnt sure what to make of it. So with you all concenus I will try to make up the differnce the best way I can.
My apologies for mismarking the card. I will see what I have in Giants or I will go to my LCS this weekend. I made a mistake and I want to make it right in all accounts
It's not a big deal, it's a very understandable mistake