Beckett Message Boards

Full Version: 1996 Select Certified help please
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
I received this card in a trade, and I'm trying to identify it...Beckett has the mirror red /90, but the mirror reds from what I see are not serial numbered and they say mirror red on the back.

[Image: Toomer_zps5ae0a8fd.jpg]

[Image: Toomer2_zps4b7cb68f.jpg]

The only thing I could find on ebay is this auction where on the back you can see it says mirror red.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/FRANK-SANDERS-70...2a3768cdbb

Does anybody have any info about this at all? Thanks!
[Image: 96SelectCertifiedRed33.jpg]
1996 Select Certified Red #33


[Image: 96SelectCertifiedMirrorRed33.jpg]
1996 Select Certified Mirror Red #33


[Image: 96SelectCertifiedMirrorRedPremiumStock33...f29bbc.jpg]
1996 Select Certified Mirror Red Premium Stock #33
Almost for certain what you got there is the Red version parallel. Reportedly 2,000 of those were created, while 50 were for the Mirror Red and 20 for the Premium Stock Mirror Red.
The mirror blues were /50. The mirror reds were /90. Op has a base red /2000. The mirror reds have a silver top corner and refractor finish to the entire card.
(02-22-2014, 05:12 PM)Marinocollector Wrote: [ -> ]The mirror blues were /50. The mirror reds were /90. Op has a base red /2000. The mirror reds have a silver top corner and refractor finish to the entire card.
You are right. It is /90 not /50 for the Mirror Reds, my bad.

(02-22-2014, 05:54 PM)nittany13 Wrote: [ -> ]You are right. It is /90 not /50 for the Mirror Reds, my bad.
Its all good. So much misinformation with this older cards, I like to keep things straight. LOL.
Definitely the basic red version and there are no actual serial numbers on any 96 select certified cards, only reported print runs... but they're pretty accurate.
Thank you guys!
I am the one who mis marked the card for trade. I will make up the difference of trade value. I thought it was mirror red and marked it as such. When we talked about the card in question I wasnt sure what to make of it. So with you all concenus I will try to make up the differnce the best way I can.

My apologies for mismarking the card. I will see what I have in Giants or I will go to my LCS this weekend. I made a mistake and I want to make it right in all accounts
(02-24-2014, 06:03 PM)waynetalger Wrote: [ -> ]I am the one who mis marked the card for trade. I will make up the difference of trade value. I thought it was mirror red and marked it as such. When we talked about the card in question I wasnt sure what to make of it. So with you all concenus I will try to make up the differnce the best way I can.

My apologies for mismarking the card. I will see what I have in Giants or I will go to my LCS this weekend. I made a mistake and I want to make it right in all accounts
It's not a big deal, it's a very understandable mistake