Posts: 182
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2009
07-15-2013, 03:07 PM
2013-14 Trilogy Question
The full checklist was just released, for the rookies there are 33 of them with 3 cards each, im wondering if all 3 are going to be considered true rookie cards, (RC designation) or just the higher one.
I collect in order 1. Dick Allen everything 2. Brian Omogrosso 1/1 3. Past Present and Future Penguins RC 4. Western PA MLB, NBA, NFL, and NHL RC's 5. Pitt players in the NBA RC's
Posts: 1,835
Threads: 156
Joined: May 2007
07-16-2013, 09:39 AM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
The only thing I could think of that compares is the 2003-04 Pristine which had three rookies for each one but only the higher #ed one was considered a RC.
Posts: 182
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2009
07-16-2013, 02:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2013, 02:31 PM by apisano.)
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
Thank you and this is going to be the same for trilogy. Only the highest #/ed will be designated with the RC on Beckett
Also sticker auto, not really high end now is it. also dont like that if you are going for the whole regular numbered set there can only be 25 in the entire world because number 200 is #/25. I find it hard to make sense of a lot of things these companies do. i forgot to add rookie redemptions for sticker auto's come on now. You have had almost 2 years to get your act together, this set seems rushed to me.
I collect in order 1. Dick Allen everything 2. Brian Omogrosso 1/1 3. Past Present and Future Penguins RC 4. Western PA MLB, NBA, NFL, and NHL RC's 5. Pitt players in the NBA RC's
Posts: 86
Threads: 17
Joined: Dec 2011
07-16-2013, 02:50 PM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
by highest, do you mean that /999 will be the RC vs. /99? or vice versa?
Posts: 2,605
Threads: 304
Joined: Apr 2010
07-16-2013, 02:54 PM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
Most plentiful will be the RC, the others will be parallels, but not technically RC's.
Posts: 182
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2009
07-16-2013, 02:57 PM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
For example Nail Yakupov has number 101,102 and 103 in the set. 101 /699 102 /399 and 103 /49 so only the one /699 is going to designated RC
I collect in order 1. Dick Allen everything 2. Brian Omogrosso 1/1 3. Past Present and Future Penguins RC 4. Western PA MLB, NBA, NFL, and NHL RC's 5. Pitt players in the NBA RC's
Posts: 86
Threads: 17
Joined: Dec 2011
07-16-2013, 02:57 PM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
i'd still rather have the lower numbered. I've been trying to find Tim Thomas Titanium /99 RC. I've only seen one online in the past year.
Posts: 21
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2011
07-16-2013, 04:58 PM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
(07-16-2013, 02:57 PM)arrowsg30 Wrote: i'd still rather have the lower numbered. I've been trying to find Tim Thomas Titanium /99 RC. I've only seen one online in the past year.
The reason you can't find them is because Timmy's been hoarding them in his survivalist bunker
Posts: 1,378
Threads: 156
Joined: Sep 2003
07-19-2013, 10:06 AM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
That's a great question, apisano.
I'm curious about the "refractor" versions of the /699 cards. Would these also be considered rcs, or just parallels?
Posts: 1,378
Threads: 156
Joined: Sep 2003
07-19-2013, 01:02 PM
RE: 2013-14 Trilogy Question
Beckett has the checklist up now. Only those /699 are considered the RC.