12-05-2011, 01:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2011, 12:00 AM by natejeffries.)
Ron Santo elected to the Hall of Fame
Ron Santo elected to the Hall of Fame
Congratulations Cubs fans. Ron Santo was elected to the Hall of Fame by the Veterans Committee today.
http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/i...-hall-fame
I know a lot of Cubs fans on here wanted him in the Hall. Unfortunately, he died a year ago and will never know he made it though I am sure it makes his family a little happier.
His former teammmate Billy Williams was on the committee this year and surely helped his cause. He received 15 of 16 votes.
He is only the 11th third baseman elected to the Hall.
His lifetime average of .277 and 342 homers are not overwhelming on their own, but are exceptional for a third baseman in the pre-steroid era.
He was always considered the next best third baseman of his era after Brooks Robinson.
He led the league in assists and putouts at the position seven times.
He also led the league in errors three times, which was a product of leading the league in chances several times. He routinely had more chances than Robinson. He only led the league in fielding percentage once and was second just once. I am assuming that the Cubs staff in that era induced a lot of ground balls. He saw a lot of action in that corner and did it all while dealing with diabetes.
Just as in the field, he was a little bit of a paradox at the plate. He had just as many home run seasons as Jim Rice - four.
He also had four seasons of striking out 100 times. That was also better than Rice, who had six 100 strikeout seasons. However, Sano also had six years of striking out between 90-99 times and that hurt his batting average a bit.
On the other hand, he led the league in walks four times and led the league in on-base percentage twice. Jim Rice never led the league in OBP.
He led the league in triples once, with 13, a number few players in the past fifty years have reached.
I think if his batting average had been 10 points higher he would have gotten in years ago.
I compare him to Rice, because all I have heard the last 20 years is how much Rice was overlooked, but hardly ever heard much for Santo until the last couple years. It would seem to be a no-brainer for Santo if Rice was worthy and I am surprised at how few votes he received from the writers. Then again, most of the writers are morons.
http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/i...-hall-fame
I know a lot of Cubs fans on here wanted him in the Hall. Unfortunately, he died a year ago and will never know he made it though I am sure it makes his family a little happier.
His former teammmate Billy Williams was on the committee this year and surely helped his cause. He received 15 of 16 votes.
He is only the 11th third baseman elected to the Hall.
His lifetime average of .277 and 342 homers are not overwhelming on their own, but are exceptional for a third baseman in the pre-steroid era.
He was always considered the next best third baseman of his era after Brooks Robinson.
He led the league in assists and putouts at the position seven times.
He also led the league in errors three times, which was a product of leading the league in chances several times. He routinely had more chances than Robinson. He only led the league in fielding percentage once and was second just once. I am assuming that the Cubs staff in that era induced a lot of ground balls. He saw a lot of action in that corner and did it all while dealing with diabetes.
Just as in the field, he was a little bit of a paradox at the plate. He had just as many home run seasons as Jim Rice - four.
He also had four seasons of striking out 100 times. That was also better than Rice, who had six 100 strikeout seasons. However, Sano also had six years of striking out between 90-99 times and that hurt his batting average a bit.
On the other hand, he led the league in walks four times and led the league in on-base percentage twice. Jim Rice never led the league in OBP.
He led the league in triples once, with 13, a number few players in the past fifty years have reached.
I think if his batting average had been 10 points higher he would have gotten in years ago.
I compare him to Rice, because all I have heard the last 20 years is how much Rice was overlooked, but hardly ever heard much for Santo until the last couple years. It would seem to be a no-brainer for Santo if Rice was worthy and I am surprised at how few votes he received from the writers. Then again, most of the writers are morons.