[rjcj2017]

No different? Right..

1st off we arent lying to anyone about our intentions. Kind of a big 1..

2nd we are taking a team that isnt even originally from sacramento

If you think this is the same situation go watch sonicsgate.

Question ... are you trying to steal a team from another city?

That's what I thought. You're no different than Oklahoma City.

But thanks for playing.

Oh, and by the way ... HOW 'BOUT THEM ANAHEIM ROYALS?

What I'm really looking forward to is the NBA doing the right thing and leaving the Kings where they belong, then giving you guys an expansion team ... AND THEN KICKING YOUR CANDY A--ES ALL OVER THE COURT FOR THE NEXT 15 YEARS!

Remember ... Seattle never had Kevin Johnson in its corner.

For more on this, please Google Royals, Anaheim.

---

"Now all we gotta do is persuade durant, westbrook and allen to come back and we'll be good"

See, this is what you all don't understand.

There are no Durants, Westbrooks or Allens on this team!

No Sikmas, no Slick Watts, no Spencer Haywoods, no Lenny Wilkens, no Shawn Kemps, no Gary Paytons ...

The Kings have only had a winning record 8 TIMES IN THE LAST 27 SEASONS!

I PROMISE YOU ... YOU DO NOT WANT THE KINGS!

ONCE THE LUSTER OF THE '"SUPER KINGS" WEARS OFF IN 2 OR 3 YEARS, YOU WILL REGRET THIS!

Leave them right where they are and wait for an expansion team.

Rather than waste your time with your stupid arguments about "well, they aren't an original Sacramento team, so it doesn't matter" ...

Ask yourself these questions:

A) Do you live in Sacramento?

— If not, are you qualified to judge whether "Sacramento is not an original team" has EVER mattered to Kings fans?

Or, more importantly, has it ever mattered to the people in positions of power, money and influence who have, are and will be doing everything necessary to keep the team here?

— If not, are you qualified to judge whether "Sacramento doesn't care, look at the attendance" is an accurate statement?

The fact that Sacramento still sells 75 percent of its tickets given the team's performance and the Maloofs' abysmal actions the last few years is beyond remarkable.

No other team in the league would be doing this, period.

B) Have you done your research? (This is rhetorical, because I know you all haven't) ...

If so, you would know that WHEN THE KINGS WERE PURCHASED BY THE BENVENUTI FAMILY, KANSAS CITY COULD HAVE KEPT THEM BY AVERAGING 10,000 FANS PER GAME ... THEY CHOSE NOT TO. THAT WAS THEIR CHOICE, AND IT BECAME THEIR PROBLEM. IT IS IRRELEVANT TO A DISCUSSION TAKING PLACE ALMOST 30 YEARS LATER.

C) Are the Kings really moving to Seattle?

The answer is no. Just ask Anaheim Royals season ticket holders how their team is doing this year.

D) Is your argument about "Hey, this is OK because Chris Hansen is being totally up front about what he plans to do" even remotely close to intelligent or logical?

Again, rhetorical, because as we know, it's not.

NOBODY IN SACRAMENTO GIVES A CRAP WHAT CHRIS HANSEN DOES OR THINKS. HE IS IRRELEVANT, AND SURE AS H-LL NOT THE ONLY PERSON WITH MONEY WHO WANTS TO OWN AN NBA TEAM.

HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF RON BURKLE? HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF MARK MASTROV?

IF YOU HAVEN'T, YOU WILL ... THEY WILL BE THE NEW OWNERS OF THE SACRAMENTO KINGS!

WHAT ALL YOU "SUPER KINGS" FANS FAIL TO REALIZE IS THAT THE KINGS' OWNERS HAVE REPEATEDLY SAID THE TEAM IS NOT FOR SALE.

THEY TRIED TO MAKE THIS DEAL BEHIND THE CITY'S BACK. NOW THAT THE CITY IS AWARE OF THE AVAILABILITY OF THE FRANCHISE, THE CITY HAS, IS AND WILL BE DOING EVERYTHING IN ITS POWER TO KEEP THE KINGS.

And when this is all said and done, the Kings will be going nowhere.

Kevin Johnson is close with David Stern. He has been given unprecedented leeway with the commissioner and the league's board of governors both in the Anaheim deal and now in the Seattle deal.

A majority ownership group will be announced shortly.

Hansen and the rest of you will just have to wait.

All right, Jason, shut the lights out!