08-14-2015, 02:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2015, 02:30 PM by gator1221.)
Derek Jeter question
Derek Jeter question
Derek Jeter question
|
08-14-2015, 02:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2015, 02:30 PM by gator1221.)
Derek Jeter question
08-14-2015, 02:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2015, 02:39 PM by magneto2.)
RE: Derek Jeter question
What year does it say on the bottom?
Found it here it is http://www.beckett.com/baseball/1998/lea...magetabs-2
08-14-2015, 02:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2015, 08:01 PM by bonds20001.)
RE: Derek Jeter question
1998 Leaf #164 Derek Jeter GLS
Hey i found it. Here it is: http://www.beckett.com/baseball/1998/lea...magetabs-2
1998 ...... They have a die cut listed and a x-axis listed but not on one card if that makes any sense to you and none numbered to 3250
That is the correct one. Beckett has it as 3050 but its 3250 and correct in the picture.
Wow I thought it would be more valuable than that ........ Lol
Your card is this one:
http://www.beckett.com/baseball/1998/lea...px-4218901 The serial number discrepancy is because back in the day Leaf/Donruss used to make the first X number of cards (in this case 200) somehow different than the rest of the print run. So cards numbered 0001-0200/3250 were the die-cut version and cards 0201 on were the regular version. Beckett lists the print run of each version separately so you have to add them together to get the same total as the serial number. It took me forever to figure this out.
I'm always open to trading. My wants are varied (multiple sets from 1980 to now and some misc. players) and all my wants are marked. Open offers welcome!
Trade Scans
08-14-2015, 03:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2015, 03:15 PM by gator1221.)
RE: Derek Jeter question (08-14-2015, 02:59 PM)flood and fire Wrote: Your card is this one: Thanks .... That seems more like the value I was thinking . So confusing ...lol I couldn't even find one on EBay or recent sales which was confusing me for a card /3250 but I guess it's really /200 ! Thanks for your help my friend
Ok i stand corrected. Thanks for the info!
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|