`
Connect With Us!
IOS Store
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2012 Rod Barajas 395-391 Error ?
#1

2012 Rod Barajas 395-391 Error ?
I have a Rod Barajas 391 that is correct and several that are the error numbered 395. Does anyone have a guess if one is a lot more common than the other?
Reply
#2

RE: 2012 Rod Barajas 395-391 Error ?
395 is also Lucroy, by the way.
[Image: k4VFlSs.png] [Image: xnRMc6d.png]

I collect Dirk Hayhurst.
Thank you jbel4331 for the banner!
Reply
#3

RE: 2012 Rod Barajas 395-391 Error ?
there are a ton of card #'ing errors in 2012 its really sad that topps has mailed it in so hard.
[Image: 2choicesig_zps9f1610c4.gif]
Reply
#4

RE: 2012 Rod Barajas 395-391 Error ?
(02-26-2013, 10:30 PM)pyr0punk Wrote: there are a ton of card #'ing errors in 2012 its really sad that topps has mailed it in so hard.
What other #ing errors are their in the 2012 Topps this is the only 1 I know of.
Reply
#5

RE: 2012 Rod Barajas 395-391 Error ?
2012 bowmans numbering was lazy

Card Numbering Notes:

BP9 Paul Hoilman - on the "official" Topps checklist is BP40
BP62 Dayan Diaz - on the "official" Topps checklist is BP82
BP20 Jeimer Candelario & BP20 Robby Price share the same number
BP108 Luis Angel Sanz - on the "official" Topps checklist is BP95

Their Chrome prospect cards (shown below) are numbered "correctly" (ie: Paul Hoilman is BCP40 and so on). Typically un-corrected error cards have no additional value. Similar numbering issues have happened in past Bowman sets.
[Image: 2choicesig_zps9f1610c4.gif]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)