The world's most trusted source in collecting
(02-27-2012 02:23 AM)rusty222 Wrote: BGS made a big mistake using 9.5 in their grading system.
(02-27-2012 02:23 AM)rusty222 Wrote: If they want to help their business they should remove it and adopt the same grading scale as PSA but no chance of that happening.
(02-27-2012 02:52 AM)nolan5000 Wrote: I couldn't disagree more.
Nor should they.
(02-27-2012 04:03 AM)rusty222 Wrote: Well I knew you would disagree with me but for me its easy decision. Assume we have a card that is really great condition with no apparent flaws. Do I send card to BGS to get a 9.5? Or do I send to PSA to get a 10 AND then have option to be able to sell it for 20-50% more? Hmmm. I think I am going to send it to PSA. In the process BGS has lost my business as PSA 10 will make the card more VALUABLE. But if you want to keep paying BGS to keep giving you those 9.5's then go right ahead.
(02-27-2012 04:55 AM)nolan5000 Wrote: Don't worry!! I will!! Just like you, it's an an easy decision for me!! I'm sticking with Beckett!!
(02-27-2012 05:29 AM)rusty222 Wrote: Understood and well put! Also please calm down your exclamation points are scaring me. I don't want to feel responsible if you blow a cornea.
(02-27-2012 05:33 AM)nolan5000 Wrote: How did you know that I don't blink my eyes? I have to literally stop and take time out and just blink ever so often.
(02-27-2012 06:04 AM)rusty222 Wrote: Yes, remember to always blink! I didn't realize I typed that LOL