Posts: 2,068
Threads: 200
Joined: Mar 2002
08-14-2011, 06:12 PM
RE: What constitutes a RC these days???
I always go by the definition beckett uses in that the true rc was the rc included in the base set.
Posts: 2,537
Threads: 52
Joined: Jan 2010
08-14-2011, 07:36 PM
RE: What constitutes a RC these days???
(08-14-2011, 01:56 PM)rogue655 Wrote: maybe i directed my anger in the wrong place... i like RCs but the fact that they produce so many different kinds of cards that there needs to be a "true RC" and Non RCs really complicates things...
I think were all just agreeing with each other anyway. I like rc's but also hate all the parallels that are stamped rc's. There have been multiple sets over the years that have done that. But I do not agree that insert cards should be rc's. Main set equals rc card to me. I think inception is really screwing things up and unlike most others, I really don't like the product. Jumbo patch autos numbered to 599!? The set is also very limited since they went with just rc's. It's different, but they also probably won't be worth much since their numbered so high.
Posts: 5,302
Threads: 99
Joined: Nov 2008
08-14-2011, 07:40 PM
RE: What constitutes a RC these days???
if it doesn't say "RC" in becketts database....sorry to say it isnt one...the rest are inserts and copy cards with different print runs to make you FEEL like you have a RC... simple...value means nothing either.