08-26-2012, 02:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-26-2012, 02:25 PM by uvaspina.)
RE: Did the Angels know what they were doing with Trout last yr??
RE: Did the Angels know what they were doing with Trout last yr??
I read an article thatMLB actually changed the rookie qualifications over the off-season, in part, to accommodate trout. While it's true that he fell just short of the AB threshold to remain a rookie, there is another qualification pertaining to days spent on a MLB roster. The way the old rule worked is that if a guy was sent down and called back up within X days, the intervening time spent in the minors would count toward MLB service. Under the old rules, Trout's one and only rookie season would have been last year. Like I said though, MLB tweaked the rule so that the intervening time wouldn't count.
EDIT: Here's a link to a November 2011 article discussing why Trout wouldn't be eligible to retain RC status in 2012. -Shortly afterward the rule was changed. http://angels.ocregister.com/2011/11/15/...rd/110903/
So, to answer the OP's question, the Angels did not manipulate the system to retain Trout's RC status. If anything, they blew it. MLB sensed the marketing opportunity and tweaked the rule.
EDIT: Here's a link to a November 2011 article discussing why Trout wouldn't be eligible to retain RC status in 2012. -Shortly afterward the rule was changed. http://angels.ocregister.com/2011/11/15/...rd/110903/
So, to answer the OP's question, the Angels did not manipulate the system to retain Trout's RC status. If anything, they blew it. MLB sensed the marketing opportunity and tweaked the rule.
Always looking for Verlander, Cabrera, Maybin, Mike Stanton (marlins), and Avisail Garcia.
*TRYING TO COMPLETE MY VERLANDER ROOKIE COLLECTION. 44/47. ONLY 3 TO GO!*