|
TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET
|
 (11-25-2011, 06:50 PM)jacobystealshome Wrote: 1990 topps still 1000x's better than 1991 fleer '91 Fleer was flat out awful from the get go and it's reputation has only grown with it over time. I almost feel like if they reversed the colors (black back/yellow writing) it MIGHT have looked a lot better. Personally, I've always liked '90 Topps for some reason. It was only a few votes ahead of '02 which someone likened to the contents of a baby diaper in the thread. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by ricelynnevans75 - 11-25-2011, 03:28 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by sesfan01 - 11-25-2011, 03:58 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by mnc99 - 11-25-2011, 05:16 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by bustin 5 knots - 11-25-2011, 06:35 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by jacobystealshome - 11-25-2011, 06:50 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by ricelynnevans75 - 11-25-2011, 07:09 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by jacobystealshome - 11-25-2011, 07:20 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by oneofakindcards - 11-25-2011, 08:24 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by jtulliakat0628 - 11-25-2011, 09:07 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by ricelynnevans75 - 11-25-2011, 09:45 PM
RE: TOPPS LEAST ATTRACTIVE BASE SET - by 86champs - 11-25-2011, 09:29 PM
|
