The story of the most infamous Star Wars card ever made – 1977 Topps Star Wars #207

When you click on links to various merchants on this site, like eBay, and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission.
Share:

The most interesting collectibles, whether it’s trading cards or something else, are those that have a story. It adds a layer of myth and intrigue. Sometimes it’s infamy. And that’s exactly the case with 1977 Topps Star Wars #207, the most notorious Star Wars trading card of all-time.

1977 Topps Star Wars Series 4 Wrapper header

It was supposed to be another regular character-based card in the fourth series of Topps’ smash line. “C-3PO (Anthony Daniels)” is about a mundane caption as you can get.

To those working on the set at Topps and the licensor, nothing seemed to stand out.

Once the cards were out there, it didn’t take long for people to notice that something definitely was.

1977 Topps Star Wars 207 C-3PO Obscene

The Story Behind the Obscene 1977 Topps Star Wars #207 Trading Card

In a book detailing (and picturing) the entire 1977 Topps Star Wars trading cards, author Gary Gerani discusses what happened. He was in the trenches at Topps, a key figure in creating the series.

The story, according to Gerani, is that there appears to have been some shenanigans on the set during filming. C-3PO was given something a little extra and a picture was taken. Today, images get spread quickly thanks to phones and social media. But back then, it wasn’t so easy. There was actually film involved.

Given the nature of the “error,” a new run of cards was required. The offending bits were airbrushed out and a new card was created.

1977 Topps Star Wars 207 C-3PO Corrected

If you’re dealing in raw vintage Star Wars trading cards, you’re usually only spending a couple of dollars each. The obscene 1977 Topps Star Wars #207 is much, much more. Why? The card has a story. It’s like the 1989 Fleer Billy Ripken of non-sport cards. Juvenile or not, it’s a piece of pop culture history.

But here’s the kicker. If you’ve tried putting together a 1977 Topps Star Wars set from scratch over the years, you likely had an easier time tracking down the uncensored #207. It’s more common than the corrected one. Both command a premium over other singles from the set, but it’s the more common one that sells for significantly more.

That’s the price of a story. And a bit of toilet humor.

When you click on links to various merchants on this site, like eBay, and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission.
Share:

Ryan Cracknell

A collector for much of his life, Ryan focuses primarily on building sets, Montreal Expos and interesting cards. He's also got one of the most comprehensive collections of John Jaha cards in existence (not that there are a lot of them). Want to get in touch? Drop him an email.

The Beckett Online Price Guide

The largest and most complete database in the industry. Period. Join the hundreds of thousands of collectors who have benefited from the OPG.

Subscribe Now

The Beckett Marketplace

Explore over 130 million cards from 70+ top-rated dealers.

Shop Now

4 comments

  1. Mike Selby 21 May, 2020 at 06:46

    I have seen some of these with double asterisks (as seen on the bottom left next to the copy right circle) and others with just one. What did these mean?

  2. John 12 September, 2021 at 03:04

    @Mike
    For printing large quantities of cards, they print a large sheet that might have hundreds of cards on it. For various reasons (size of paper cutting machinery, or just difficulty handling such large sheets with precision) they cut the sheet in half before cutting down to the final size. Since you have a wide gap between the two halves (a “gutter”) it doesn’t need to be a precise cut. So say you have a stack of 256-card sheets, you’d cut that down to two stacks of 128-card sheets. One of these sheets would have a *, the other **. I imagine this is because a left-hand sheet has a gutter on the right hand side, while a right-hand sheet has a gutter on the left-hand size. You might theoretically flip one stack on top the other so that both can be cut at the same time, but there’s reasons you wouldn’t want to do this. For one you’d be cutting while looking at the front of one stack, while actually cutting the back of another. If for some reason they weren’t printed perfectly, this might mess up half the cards. So you make sure each stack gets cut separately and to help with that, you mark them.

Leave a reply

We use cookies to help personalize content, tailor and measure ads, and provide a safer experience. By navigating the site, you agree to the use of cookies to collect information. Read our Cookie Policy.
Accept & Close