[hempick]

According to Beckett's database, Zigmund Palffy has two rookies in the 91-92 Upper Deck (and two in the French version) set, but that doesn't make sense to me.

Usually when a player appears more than once in a set, only their first card numerically is their rookie card.

In fact, some other rookies appear twice in the set, but only their first card is listed as a rookie. I guess this is just an error on Beckett's part.

Thoughts?

http://www.beckett.com/search/?term=1991...start=1991

[ntgsportscards]

both cards are in the same series so both are considered rookies.

[hempick]

both cards are in the same series so both are considered rookies.

Ahh, that makes sense.

Thanks for the clarification!