`
Connect With Us!
IOS Store
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How good were these pulls? Also a question.
#1
Rainbow 
How good were these pulls? Also a question.
I bought the last box of 2010 topps updates a lcs had and I pulled these two cards.

Jason Vargas black 55/59
Mike Redmond silk collection 46/50.

both of these pulls were surprises to me.

My question is this why does the numbering on the black card look like it was done with a ink jet printer? all of the gold cards I pulled as well looked like this. I know that before and after this set the gold cards numbered were indented and in gold but not this set why?
Reply
#2

RE: How good were these pulls? Also a question.
Nice pulls not sure why they were # like that..
[Image: griffeyjr.jpg]
Reply
#3

RE: How good were these pulls? Also a question.
They started doing that last year i believe. It probably costs more to use embossing on cheap card stock. Bowman Chrome for example still has an embossed number.
Reply
#4

RE: How good were these pulls? Also a question.
(10-04-2016, 04:28 PM)magneto2 Wrote: They started doing that last year i believe. It probably costs more to use embossing on cheap card stock. Bowman Chrome for example still has an embossed number.
Generally all the chrome stock has nice numbering no matter which producdt.

But Bowman paper also has nice numbering compared to flagship. Topps doesn't treat all their brands equally here, probably because flagship Topps will always sell but they want to get more people into Bowman so they have another set to sell people.
Bowman: home of the pre-rookie card.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)