12-16-2013, 06:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2013, 07:01 PM by eggscards.)
62 topps mazeroski
62 topps mazeroski
Any one else have this card with bad color? Mine seems to look like a bad negative?
62 topps mazeroski
|
12-16-2013, 06:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2013, 07:01 PM by eggscards.)
62 topps mazeroski
Any one else have this card with bad color? Mine seems to look like a bad negative?
Does it have a greenish tint to it? what do you mean by bad colour?
12-16-2013, 10:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2013, 10:12 PM by Haze28.)
RE: 62 topps mazeroski
Scan of the card would help very much.
Quote from Beckett.... "The second series had two distinct printings which are distinguishable by numerous color and pose variations. Those cards with a distinctive "green tint" are valued at a slight premuim as they are basically the result of a flawed printing process occurring early in the second series run."
(12-20-2013, 04:36 PM)cptnemo66 Wrote: Quote from Beckett.... "The second series had two distinct printings which are distinguishable by numerous color and pose variations. Those cards with a distinctive "green tint" are valued at a slight premuim as they are basically the result of a flawed printing process occurring early in the second series run."Sounds like we have a winner!
I appreciate Chicago players that begin competing within the city's sports organizations and stay with these teams throughout their careers.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|