I just cant take wins or k's as a serious reason for making someone the best ever. wins is solely a dependent stat. k's can mean dominance, but if you have a high era and a boatload of walks, are you still a great pitcher?
Share Thread:
|
The best pitcher ever: your opinion wanted
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)