`
Connect With Us!
IOS Store
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OT: Football Question...
#11

RE: OT: Football Question...
Not a chance I replace Vick. He's had his fumbling problems this year but if it wasnt for the defense not being able to hold they could very well be 5-1 even with their so-so play. Your gonna put in a rookie quarterback based on what he did in the PRESEASON? Heck Jimmy Clausen looked decent this preaseason but theres no chance he'd sniff the field. Oh and from what ive seen, the Philly line looks terrible, so yea another reason you dont throw a rookie qb in.
Reply
#12

RE: OT: Football Question...
(10-15-2012, 12:02 PM)jdetter23 Wrote: Not a chance I replace Vick. He's had his fumbling problems this year but if it wasnt for the defense not being able to hold they could very well be 5-1 even with their so-so play. Your gonna put in a rookie quarterback based on what he did in the PRESEASON? Heck Jimmy Clausen looked decent this preaseason but theres no chance he'd sniff the field. Oh and from what ive seen, the Philly line looks terrible, so yea another reason you dont throw a rookie qb in.
Some valid points here but why expect the defense to hold when Vick keeps forcing the defense to hold? No defense can hold as much as Vick forces them to. If Foles came in and didnt turn the ball over he would already be more effective than Vick. The Eagles offense doesnt need an elite QB to win games. They need a QB who doesnt make mistakes.

And the reason why Clausen has no chance to see the field is because of someone named Cam Newton!
Unique Cards:
Dolphins - 6000+
Marino - 2140
Zach Thomas - 869
Jason Taylor - 749
Lamar Miller - 341
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)