went through my 1st box break of contenders and i pulled a t.j. graham auto... card#231 and its supposed to be an oncard auto.. but this one is a sticker. needless to say the box "guarentees" 2 on-cards but i only got 1 technically.
any thoughts?
![[Image: 2013-02-12_19-21-33_895_zpsa94b8e81.jpg]](http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac22/jfrenchW/2013-02-12_19-21-33_895_zpsa94b8e81.jpg)
I got one too. As far as I can tell, they didn't want to have too many redemptions so they put stickers on some of what were supposed to be on-card autos
(02-12-2013, 07:46 PM)jkiddlridnour Wrote: [ -> ]I got one too. As far as I can tell, they didn't want to have too many redemptions so they put stickers on some of what were supposed to be on-card autos
i was thinking that.. stinks that its that one cause im a bills fan!
Yeah the Graham was suppose to be an on-card auto, but by the looks of what Panini has said they struggled to get a lot of the on cards autoed so they stuck sticker autos on a lot of these cards to cut down the amount of redemptions. I guess they figure it is the less of the two evils!
They have mentioned on their blog I think it was that the players that do not have the white space at the bottom (like the Graham) are all suppose to be on-card.
My Michael Egnew is the same way. Plus his autograph is cut off, so much for a SP Variation.
![[Image: 001_zpse4dfb308.jpg]](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c358/sportscardsnstuff/001_zpse4dfb308.jpg)
(02-12-2013, 08:19 PM)ZeroDave Wrote: [ -> ]My Michael Egnew is the same way. Plus his autograph is cut off, so much for a SP Variation.
That looks terrible. Id be unhappy
(02-12-2013, 08:19 PM)ZeroDave Wrote: [ -> ]My Michael Egnew is the same way. Plus his autograph is cut off, so much for a SP Variation.
That really is a terrible and should have never gotten past Quality Control.
Panini at their finest I tell you.
Gotta love Panini and their BS practices...
This is why think they should get rid of all guarantees on boxes. We never get what we expect. So frustrating.