I find PSA to be too inconsistent with their grading. I looked at three cards last night, one with a qualifier (OC), one with (MC) and one with nothing. The one with the (OC) was the worst card, it should have got the (MC)! and the one without a qualifier was DEFINATELY worse than the (MC), and should have at least got a (OC),,, go figure.
Either way, that card looks nice to me. Great eye appeal and thats all that matters to me as a collector.
(02-01-2012, 10:37 AM)rwtzero Wrote: [ -> ]I find PSA to be too inconsistent with their grading. I looked at three cards last night, one with a qualifier (OC), one with (MC) and one with nothing. The one with the (OC) was the worst card, it should have got the (MC)! and the one without a qualifier was DEFINATELY worse than the (MC), and should have at least got a (OC),,, go figure.
Either way, that card looks nice to me. Great eye appeal and thats all that matters to me as a collector.
Ditto. I've seen PSA give 4's and 5's on cards with paper loss.