`
 (Toll Free)

Collectors, dealers react to exclusive hockey card agreement

By Susan Lulgjuraj | Beckett Hockey Editor

Upper Deck’s exclusive trading card deal with the NHL and NHLPA, which was announced Thursday, drew a range of reactions from collectors and dealers. Some are intrigued to see what Upper Deck will do, while others enjoyed the competition in the marketplace with Panini America.

“I’m very excited to see Upper Deck back as a major card company again with an exclusive license,” said collector Mitch Kalman of Herndon, Va. “They have been an innovator of technology dating back to the early ‘90s with holograms, booklets, etc. Upper Deck brings a lot of great ideas to the industry.”

Not all collectors were as optimistic as Kalman. Upper Deck and Panini shared the marketplace over the past four years. Panini brought brands such as Score and Crown Royale back while adding Prime and Dominion.

“I don’t think an exclusive or monopoly is a good thing for consumers in any business, no matter who controls it,” said Wayne Frazer of The IceBox Cards and Collectibles in Barrie, Ontario. “I have no issue with Upper Deck ‘winning’ over Panini — I was rooting for both to continue rather than just one.”

Many dealers want to see collectors have options when it come to selecting products. From their standpoint, less variety is not a good thing.

“From a retailer perspective, I believe it’s always best to have competition,” said Blowout Cards’ Thomas Fish. “I thought both manufacturers were doing a decent job making hockey cards. I don’t like exclusives or monopolies. We want to offer as many varieties as possible. … I believe competition stirs innovation. The industry needs innovation. Having Panini and Upper Deck competing is better for my business and customers.”

Scott McCharles of Stadium Sports Cards in Blenheim, Ontario believes Upper Deck and Panini pushed each other, leading to better products.

“I thought Panini made Upper Deck better,” McCharles said. “I like what both companies have been doing. The younger crowd was attracted to Panini, while the older guys wanted Upper Deck.”

The Panini NHL stickers were a big draw in McCharles’ shop. Children would come in after school and pick up packs of stickers. Some of the other popular Panini products in his store included the newest release Totally Certified, as well as Select – the first product that came out under the official Double Rookie Class this season.

While Panini was working to grow its hockey offerings, Upper Deck’s brands have been around for years, solidifying brand equity. Upper Deck Series 1 and 2 are consistent best-sellers, especially with the Young Guns Rookie Cards. Next season’s release will be the 25th consecutive for the brand.

That history is making some hobbyists excited about the future of Upper Deck in the marketplace, including bringing back products such as MVP and Upper Deck ICE. Recently, those brands have only appeared as inserts in other products.

Upper Deck hasn’t fully determined the product lineup for 2014-15, but said that the first product will be MVP when it releases in August. It will include 99-cent retail packs. Fleer Ultra will also return in September, another product appealing to collectors looking for low-end nostalgia.

“We are excited to have more details on releases in the future, but we are more interested in hearing what hockey fans want over the next few weeks so we can build products incorporating that feedback,” said Upper Deck’s Chris Carlin. “We are listening.”

Susan Lulgjuraj is an editor at Beckett Media. You can email her here with questions, comments or ideas. Follow her on Twitter here. Follow Beckett Media on Facebook and Twitter.

7 Comments

Paul

Watch how many sets UD puts out once it’s the exclusive. All sports need competition– would love to see across the board a cap on releases per year so companies put out the best stuff possible.

Posted February 28, 2014 at 8:40 am | Permalink
Michel Bergeron

Hi, would appreciate that we keep having competition and get back to where we dont have 100 rookie per year in set should be in subset so that we set collector could build set .

Posted February 28, 2014 at 10:22 am | Permalink
CashforGold

ud exquisite are the nicest hockey cards ever produced. i’m glad ud got the license and not some cheap generic company like ITG. poor brian price, no nhl license and no invitation to the summitt

Posted February 28, 2014 at 11:53 am | Permalink

If “brand equity” is a factor, then why did Upper Deck first get an exclusive in 2005-06 over Topps, which had been making NHL cards since 1954? If anyone got an exclusive, it should have been In the Game, which makes better cards than either Upper Deck or Panini even without a license. I’m really going to miss the Score hockey set, though – and I hate what Upper Deck’s done with O-Pee-Chee the past few years. That’s the company’s only comprehensive set, and it looks like total garbage.

I’m also still waiting for Upper Deck to make a CFL football set. For those not familiar, Upper Deck was granted the exclusive CFL license last year over Canadian maker Jogo, which had made cards every year since 1981. Then Upper Deck proceeded not to bother actually making any CFL cards with its exclusive license, while Jogo could make only a series of small sets devoted to retired players. Thanks for that, Upper Deck!

Posted February 28, 2014 at 12:22 pm | Permalink
aaron

I wish Topps and In The Game would have been able to get licenses….Upper Deck hasnt done much new or exciting. But since there is nothing to change it – Upper Deck should demand better autographs from players – the checks and scribbles are not quality cards.

Posted February 28, 2014 at 12:53 pm | Permalink
CJ

@cashforgold: there has never been UD Exquisite Hockey. It’s called The Cup.

Posted February 28, 2014 at 1:01 pm | Permalink
David Quinn

Not a fan of exclusive deals to one company. I believe in survival of the fittest in business. If your product is better, you will sell more then your competitor. If you have “zero” competition, you have no reason to give it 100% effort.

Posted March 2, 2014 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*