9 Comments

Yay! Destruction of a severely limited number of historical artifacts (assuming, of course, they are genuine) just to placate a slowly but steadily shrinking number of well-healed collectors who couldn’t afford to buy the actual item when it was intact.

Forgive me for not showing more enthusiasm for this otherwise great news.

Not a new debate.

Regardless of whether it’s a new debate or not, it’s still an issue. I think the rather cavalier attitude taken in general by the hobby over this particular issue is troubling — especially in the cases of players who played pre-WW II. Debates over issues such as this shouldn’t be ignored just because they’re “old.” It would be nice, every once in a while, to see Beckett acknowledge the downside to memorabilia cards for players such as Johnson instead of cheerleading every single release of such cards.

I’m not going to beat a dead horse with coverage. It’s been discussed in the past.

And in the case of Johnson, the items are too expensive to buy — at least because they alone wouldn’t help sell a ton of product to justify it. In the case of a single ball, an item like this likely only cost a few grand. That’s compared to five or six figures for scarce bats or uniform pieces.

The value of an artifact is its story more so than its actual physical self. This is a way to share that story with a larger number of people. How can that be a bad thing?

That aside, The Big Train was a beast. Hopefully this card will help bring his name to younger collectors that may not know his story and how great of a ball player he truly was. The guy averaged almost 20 wins a season, CRAZY!

Great news for HOF relic collectors and I hope to at least just see a Big Train relic some day.

The issue has been beaten to death but here’s my two cents . . . Part of me hated and still winces at the dismembering artifacts but Babe Ruth’s daughter changed my opinion by participating in her father’s jersey cutting and stating that he would have loved the whole idea. I can’t argue with that.

Holding a Gehrig relic card and touching his pinstripes with my own hand is an experience I would have otherwise never had too.

If you’ve owned clothes for over 2-4 decades (or in this case much more), you have a better understanding of things have a tendency to deteriorate over enough time, no matter what you do to them.
At the point where you can hardly recognize the item, you may wish you had turned them into cards when you had the chance.
The items were once amazing to view, but that’s why photography was invented. Instead of building a hoarded room of items (and that’s essentially what it is), why not share some of the excitement of these items with the masses, while the masses still remember who these ‘greats’ were!

Just my 2¢.

wow, a baseball- that may have been thrown by the other team that day- could we get some grass from Griffith Stadium was? or grass from where it is today?- id rather wait and get something of value to kill then reach

Not to mention the signature they destroyed on it.