<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Look: 2011 Topps Supreme Football</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/#comment-76154</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beckett.com/news/?p=35259#comment-76154</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why people are putting down Topps. Topps product&#039;s this year have been five times better than Panini. Every Panini box I&#039;ve bought has been nothing but a waste of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why people are putting down Topps. Topps product&#8217;s this year have been five times better than Panini. Every Panini box I&#8217;ve bought has been nothing but a waste of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/#comment-76150</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beckett.com/news/?p=35259#comment-76150</guid>
		<description>Its Topps so you can rest easy knowing it will be the least amount of hits and autos for your money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its Topps so you can rest easy knowing it will be the least amount of hits and autos for your money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Schumacher</title>
		<link>http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/#comment-76138</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Schumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beckett.com/news/?p=35259#comment-76138</guid>
		<description>Unless I am reading the article wrong, shouldn&#039;t there be a minimum 20 autographs in each case?  Topps states &quot;...one autograph AND either one autographed relic or relic in each pack&quot;.  The 16 box case pack out states that there will only be 11 autographs in the case.  Which is it?  If you get one autograph per pack and with the guarantee of 4 additional autographed relics per case, the total should be 20 total autographs.  Can you clear this up for me?  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I am reading the article wrong, shouldn&#8217;t there be a minimum 20 autographs in each case?  Topps states &#8220;&#8230;one autograph AND either one autographed relic or relic in each pack&#8221;.  The 16 box case pack out states that there will only be 11 autographs in the case.  Which is it?  If you get one autograph per pack and with the guarantee of 4 additional autographed relics per case, the total should be 20 total autographs.  Can you clear this up for me?  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/#comment-76100</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 07:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beckett.com/news/?p=35259#comment-76100</guid>
		<description>In a blind taste test........4 out of 5 consumers couldnt tell the difference between 2010 supreme FB; and the preview images for the 2011 edition !!

There is a 60:60 chance the test might need to be re-done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a blind taste test&#8230;&#8230;..4 out of 5 consumers couldnt tell the difference between 2010 supreme FB; and the preview images for the 2011 edition !!</p>
<p>There is a 60:60 chance the test might need to be re-done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrozens</title>
		<link>http://www.beckett.com/news/2011/09/first-look-2011-topps-supreme/#comment-76067</link>
		<dc:creator>mrozens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beckett.com/news/?p=35259#comment-76067</guid>
		<description>I am sooooo tired of the same lame issue of football cards showing players wearing helmets. It the same thing over and over again. I can understand team players not wanting to draw personal attention to themselves and not the team. But really,put a huge logo on the card and show some faces...its really old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sooooo tired of the same lame issue of football cards showing players wearing helmets. It the same thing over and over again. I can understand team players not wanting to draw personal attention to themselves and not the team. But really,put a huge logo on the card and show some faces&#8230;its really old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
