Comments on: MLB Properties assures legal action in statement on Upper Deck's latest baseball card sets

By: Baseball’s Rogue Card Set: 2010 Upper Deck | NotGraphs Baseball

Baseball’s Rogue Card Set: 2010 Upper Deck | NotGraphs Baseball — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:43:18 +0000

[...] response of Major League Baseball was swift. In a statement released on Jaunary 28th, MLB announced that they “were surprised and disappointed that Upper Deck, a former partner of ours, would [...]

By: Blog Kiosk: 1/31/2010 | DodgersVine

Blog Kiosk: 1/31/2010 | DodgersVine — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:09:43 +0000

[...] A lawsuit is brewing between Upper Deck and [...]

By: Upper Deck and Konami Settle | DodgersVine

Upper Deck and Konami Settle | DodgersVine — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:02:05 +0000

[...] courtroom will probably not be over as Major League Baseball Properties has already thrown out an opening salvo in a oncoming licensing dispute. I’ll be sure to write more about this upcoming Baseball card [...]

By: Phil Regetta

Phil Regetta — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:42:17 +0000

What exactly is a pingback and why do I keep seeing them in the comments? They don’t seem to be of any benefit.

By: quambomb

quambomb — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:59:02 +0000

If they are talking about Upper Deck Ultimate Collection then I am going to have to side with UD. That product is insanely amazing and collectors should be happy. Thanks UD for an awesome product and good luck in court

By: Offy

Offy — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:52:22 +0000

Good. Upper Deck knew full well what they were doing when they produced these cards. It seems to me that they didn’t think they’d survive too long after the Konami lawsuit with just two licences and decided to go out in a blaze of glory. I’m sure that a lawsuit from Topps isn’t far behind.

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:47:59 +0000

Sounds good to me. Did Upper Deck just want to get out this product, make some $$$, and then deal with the repercussions later? I guess they could do a “sorry, we won’t do it again” but it shouldn’t come without a penalty.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:52:00 +0000

[...] [...]