Post Reply 
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
06-22-2008, 04:23 AM
Post: #11
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
moses21x Wrote:
Magical Hawk Wrote:just why exactly would portland want jamaal? he's injury prone...and he isn't exactly a good character guy on to add to that team!
I collect tinsley and would love to see him stay in indiana! why he catches so much flack is beyond me...he isn't injured anymore then JO is...

Jamaal Tinsley

01-02 80 games
02-03 73
03-04 52
04-05 40
05-06 42
06-07 72
07-08 39

398 games

Jermaine O'Neal

01-02 72
02-03 77
03-04 78
04-05 44
05-06 51
06-07 69
07-08 42

433 games

Not to mention Tinsley is a flat out vag. He goes down over hangnails and stubbed toes. Jermaine's injuries have been mostly his knee over the past 3 years. Jermaine actually rehabs to try to get healthy and keeps himself in shape. Tinsley is a lazy bum who is notorious for having a poor work ethic and bad conditioning. He does absolutely nothing to make fans want to cheer for him. Jermaine actually makes an effort to rally support for the team.
:lol: Tinsley sucks, but I think JO does too. If they're healthy they're good (both JO and JT) but neither is ever really healthy. I think if the Pacers got anyone who can stay healthy and put up decent numbers to replace them, they're better off
Quote this message in a reply
06-22-2008, 04:26 AM
Post: #12
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
LMAO this blog is a joke. They gave away Zach Randolph only to pay Francis 20 mill to leave. There is no way they take on Tinsley and his rep/attitude. Also, they are trying not to get contracts over 2010, and Tinsley's is over that. Simply put, there is not a snowballs chance in hell it happens. Especially not for the 13th pick, thats just ridiculous.
Quote this message in a reply
06-22-2008, 04:27 AM
Post: #13
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
pacerspsycho Wrote::lol: Tinsley sucks, but I think JO does too. If they're healthy they're good (both JO and JT) but neither is ever really healthy. I think if the Pacers got anyone who can stay healthy and put up decent numbers to replace them, they're better off

A healthy J.O. is a heck of an asset, and from the reports out of Vegas, he's completely healthy and in very good shape. I'm excited to see what he can do for us once the season starts. I say we should keep him at least long enough to see how he's going to perform. His trade value can't really drop any further than it is right now, it can only go up. So I say we keep him and see how he performs. Who knows we may actually have a respectable team if we can manage to pull off a coupe in the Draft.
Quote this message in a reply
06-22-2008, 04:42 AM
Post: #14
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
moses21x Wrote:
pacerspsycho Wrote::lol: Tinsley sucks, but I think JO does too. If they're healthy they're good (both JO and JT) but neither is ever really healthy. I think if the Pacers got anyone who can stay healthy and put up decent numbers to replace them, they're better off

A healthy J.O. is a heck of an asset, and from the reports out of Vegas, he's completely healthy and in very good shape. I'm excited to see what he can do for us once the season starts. I say we should keep him at least long enough to see how he's going to perform. His trade value can't really drop any further than it is right now, it can only go up. So I say we keep him and see how he performs. Who knows we may actually have a respectable team if we can manage to pull off a coupe in the Draft.
Yeah, you're right, I just want them to make a trade so I have something to be excited aboutBig Grin
Quote this message in a reply
06-22-2008, 05:52 PM
Post: #15
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
Man, this would be a horrible trade for the Blazers, I would be so disapointed if it went down. Pritchard is one of the few GMs in the league who seems to consistently make good decisions and I can't believe that he would ever trade a lottery pick for a cancer like Tinsley.
Quote this message in a reply
06-23-2008, 02:14 AM
Post: #16
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
mattreis32 Wrote:Man, this would be a horrible trade for the Blazers, I would be so disapointed if it went down. Pritchard is one of the few GMs in the league who seems to do a consistently make good decisions and I can't believe that he would ever trade a lottery pick for a cancer like Tinsley.

Trust me I think it would be completely idiotic for Pritchard to do as well, but I'm praying he has a brain fart and pulls the trigger on this. Sorry Portland fans but I'd rather Tinsleberries be anything other than a Pacer.
Quote this message in a reply
06-23-2008, 04:28 AM
Post: #17
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
moses21x Wrote:
pacerspsycho Wrote::lol: Tinsley sucks, but I think JO does too. If they're healthy they're good (both JO and JT) but neither is ever really healthy. I think if the Pacers got anyone who can stay healthy and put up decent numbers to replace them, they're better off

A healthy J.O. is a heck of an asset, and from the reports out of Vegas, he's completely healthy and in very good shape. I'm excited to see what he can do for us once the season starts. I say we should keep him at least long enough to see how he's going to perform. His trade value can't really drop any further than it is right now, it can only go up. So I say we keep him and see how he performs. Who knows we may actually have a respectable team if we can manage to pull off a coupe in the Draft.
moses what makes you so sure JO will still be a pacer next year?
Quote this message in a reply
06-23-2008, 04:36 AM
Post: #18
Pacers possibly dealing Tinsley to Portland??
Magical Hawk Wrote:
moses21x Wrote:
pacerspsycho Wrote::lol: Tinsley sucks, but I think JO does too. If they're healthy they're good (both JO and JT) but neither is ever really healthy. I think if the Pacers got anyone who can stay healthy and put up decent numbers to replace them, they're better off

A healthy J.O. is a heck of an asset, and from the reports out of Vegas, he's completely healthy and in very good shape. I'm excited to see what he can do for us once the season starts. I say we should keep him at least long enough to see how he's going to perform. His trade value can't really drop any further than it is right now, it can only go up. So I say we keep him and see how he performs. Who knows we may actually have a respectable team if we can manage to pull off a coupe in the Draft.
moses what makes you so sure JO will still be a pacer next year?

Not saying it's 100% that he will be with us, but it's much more likely than it is that Tinsley will. The organization actually has faith in J.O. and respects what he brings to the table. Everyone from Coach O'Brien to Jim Morway wants Tinsley gone.
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)