[beckettcards578]

[mooney21]

beckettcards578 Wrote:

YES SIR IT IS

[jstump37]

If it is a refractor (or any other parallel), then it's not a true rookie card. If it is a base Bowman Chrome, then it is a true rookie card.

[jamesrud7380]

jstump37 Wrote:If it is a refractor (or any other parallel), then it's not a true rookie card. If it is a base Bowman Chrome, then it is a true rookie card.

It's a refractor.

[MadMan1978]

I guess I am old school
to me that isnt a RC card
but a card from his rookie year

[rosschrisman2003]

i'd say its a rookie. i think collectors should decide what is a rookie and not the corporations.

[jfreakdj777]

ITS A ROOKIE!!!!! WHO CARES IF IT IS A TRUE RC IT IS A ROOKIE!!!

[jstump37]

MadMan1978 Wrote:I guess I am old school
to me that isnt a RC card
but a card from his rookie year

And you would be correct.

[big7ben77]

Since it is a refractor, I guess you could technically say it is an insert, therfore it would not be a TRUE Rookie Card. However, In my opinion I would treat it as a RC.

[J-Rob7]

It is NOT a RC, but will always book higher and sell higher than the non-refractor version, so does it really matter what tag it has? Its the better card!