`
Connect With Us!
IOS Store
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Which Andrew Luck Rookie Card is Better?
#1

Which Andrew Luck Rookie Card is Better?
I have these two and am wanting to get opinions on which is the better card and which will be the best one investment wise. Thanks again.

2012 Panini Contenders Andrew Luck Auto #-550 BGS 9.5

2012 Topps Chrome Andrew Luck Rookie Autographs BGS 9.5
Reply
#2

RE: Which Andrew Luck Rookie Card is Better?
I would prefer the Contenders.
If you have less than 20 feedback you're sending first.

Reply
#3

RE: Which Andrew Luck Rookie Card is Better?
I also would keep the Contenders long term. The Contenders is a true RC while the Topps Chrome is not. You can't really go wrong with either one of them.
[Image: UWashBanner2.jpg]
Banner by mattfastiggi
Collecting: Brett Favre (7,771 unique as of 6/1/2015), Packers, UW Huskies (Shaq Thompson, Shelton, Peters, Kikaha, Sankey, ASJ, Trufant, Locker, Brunell, Dillon, etc.)
Reply
#4

RE: Which Andrew Luck Rookie Card is Better?
why not keep them both?
[Image: TT8dhuE.png]
Collecting Terrell Owens,Tom Brady,Peyton Manning, Josh Hamilton, Alex Smith
If you don't have any HIGH end cards, please don't try to acquire one of mine. Thank you.
Reply
#5

RE: Which Andrew Luck Rookie Card is Better?
I like the Topps Chrome. I bet they printed less than /550 of it. If you had the contenders variation out of /75 I would say contenders
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)