The world's most trusted source in collecting
(10-04-2013 05:31 PM)rjcj2017 Wrote: I may be in the minority here, but I have always disagreed with the notion of "de-valuing" cards by getting them signed ... to me, they are worth more, because they ... are ... signed.
Put it this way ... if you pull Mike Trout's base RC out of a pack of cards, and then pull his certified auto RC out of a pack of cards, which one is worth more?
Obviously some people look at it no differently than say a bent corner or a crease, which I understand ... and it may be tougher to sell a non-certified IP auto, but would you ever sell those Yaz cards in the first place?
So in that sense, they are worth much more to you than the same ones unsigned.
(10-04-2013 07:29 PM)hongkongfooey Wrote: but if you pull a trout base and have him sign you're out a $12 card which is awesome because you saw him sign it as opposed to a mint Yaz worth a few hundred. I'm all for IP autos but not on high dollar cards
Are you gonna have Hank Aaron sign his Rookie card?
(10-07-2013 07:04 AM)iconms Wrote:
(10-07-2013 03:09 PM)RobbinsDynasty Wrote: off the cuff. What does it usually run just to get autos authenticated?