`
Connect With Us!
IOS Store
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1952 Topps and 1910 E98 Set of 30
#1

1952 Topps and 1910 E98 Set of 30
I just recently bought a 1952 Topps Pee Wee Reese PSA 3 (VG). I am still waiting on the card which I will recieve this week. But my question is I spend $500 on the card. The dealer dropped $50 off the card and the card is priced $400 in the grade. I was wonder if that is a good deal on the card? My second question is about Feburary of this year I bought a 1910 E98 Honus Wagner PSA 2. The grade counts for paper lost on the back of the card. I paid $1999.99 for the card and it is valued at $1600.00 in good condition which I think is way to late for the card because of the rarety. Please give me a good feedback of the 2 cards. Thanks Chad
Reply
#2

RE: 1952 Topps and 1910 E98 Set of 30
Both sound nice and scarce the 52 sounds like a good deal comparing it to whats online at this time,not sure about the other its older than I collect..
Reply
#3

RE: 1952 Topps and 1910 E98 Set of 30
Use CardTarget or VCP for pricing.
CardTarget captures the latest sale prices (free)
The 52 PeeWeeReese in PSA3 sales show 491.33 ..this is not the average, just the past sale.
Check at VCP (VintageCardPrices) for a average price paid. (subscription)

As for the Wagner 1910 E98 --- NICE i always want a Wagner
aussuming "Set of 30"
PSA 2 says 1,513.00

*** of course it is up to how much the buyer wants to pay. Nice eye appeal, centering adds value.
The Wag, well sells itself, because its a Wag. As long the paper loss is on the back, that should be fine, people want a nice front.
ALWAYS BUY THE CARD, NOT THE HOLDER


Collecting ROOKIE CARDS 40-60's, 25 Gehrig, fancraze-wagner
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)