The world's most trusted source in collecting
(03-01-2013 11:56 AM)alifaxwa2 Wrote: I agree. I overlayed it with another one, aligned the inner black box perfectly and yours definitely is thinner.
(03-01-2013 12:22 PM)philc80 Wrote: The general consensus on the other forum seems to be that the '89 upper decks were really inconsistent in terms of dimensions, so it is very unlikely that the card was tamped with.
(03-02-2013 02:47 PM)nolan5000 Wrote: What's to say that all the cards that you're comparing the BGS 9.5 Griffey too, wouldn't grade BGS 7 or lower. What I'm saying is, what if you're comparing the 9.5 to a card that would actually grade a BGS 7?