[jfrench91]

went through my 1st box break of contenders and i pulled a t.j. graham auto... card#231 and its supposed to be an oncard auto.. but this one is a sticker. needless to say the box "guarentees" 2 on-cards but i only got 1 technically.

any thoughts?

[jkiddlridnour]

I got one too. As far as I can tell, they didn't want to have too many redemptions so they put stickers on some of what were supposed to be on-card autos

[jfrench91]

(02-12-2013 06:46 PM)jkiddlridnour Wrote:  I got one too. As far as I can tell, they didn't want to have too many redemptions so they put stickers on some of what were supposed to be on-card autos

i was thinking that.. stinks that its that one cause im a bills fan!

[ekalbNZ]

Yeah the Graham was suppose to be an on-card auto, but by the looks of what Panini has said they struggled to get a lot of the on cards autoed so they stuck sticker autos on a lot of these cards to cut down the amount of redemptions. I guess they figure it is the less of the two evils!

They have mentioned on their blog I think it was that the players that do not have the white space at the bottom (like the Graham) are all suppose to be on-card.

[ZeroDave]

My Michael Egnew is the same way. Plus his autograph is cut off, so much for a SP Variation.

[jfrench91]

(02-12-2013 07:19 PM)ZeroDave Wrote:  My Michael Egnew is the same way. Plus his autograph is cut off, so much for a SP Variation.

That looks terrible. Id be unhappy

[ekalbNZ]

(02-12-2013 07:19 PM)ZeroDave Wrote:  My Michael Egnew is the same way. Plus his autograph is cut off, so much for a SP Variation.

That really is a terrible and should have never gotten past Quality Control.

[ZeroDave]

Panini at their finest I tell you.

[erasertwentytwo]

Gotta love Panini and their BS practices...

[kollectornet]

This is why think they should get rid of all guarantees on boxes. We never get what we expect. So frustrating.