`
 (Toll Free)
Post Reply 
Share Thread:
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
11-04-2012, 04:56 PM
Post: #1
1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
Hi Folks!

First, please forgive me as I am new here and to card collecting. I apologize in advance if I have put this in the wrong area of the forums. I also thank you in advance for any advice you can lend, as well as for your knowledge.

I recently picked up a 1968 Topps Pete Rose #230. I obtained it from a gentlemen who says he has owned it for at least 20 years. Upon inspection (before purchasing it) I gave it a cursory look over for the usual stuff (centering, edges, corners etc..). However being an amateur I honestly made a colossal mistake by not noticing a small "4" written on the back of the card in black ink. Had I noticed it, I certainly would have passed on buying it.

I wanted to post the card here for you folks to advise me on whether or not I should sending it out for grading. Its not my desire to spend more money on the card grading it, then the card value itself. I only have a general idea of the value really. So if you could lend your opinion as to whether its worth grading, I certainly appreciate it A LOT! =)

Upon my inspection, I note the following flaws: 2 corners have very minor creases/wear but its not terrible (to my amateur eyes). The centering is a bit off and of course the "4" marked in ink on the rear. Other than that, the card looks pretty nice to me. I do understand that graders are very critical and expect my card to be pinged for more flaws than I actually see.

Anyhow, thanks again, here are the images!

[Image: 1.jpg]
[Image: 2.jpg]
[Image: 3.jpg]
[Image: 4.jpg]
[Image: 5.jpg]
[Image: 6.jpg]
[Image: 7.jpg]
[Image: 8.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-04-2012, 09:11 PM
Post: #2
RE: 1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
I would say nay, espescially with the pen markings on the other side. It will get a very low grade.

Colect mainly Red Sox GU/autos/relics but am open to items from any team
http://s1249.photobucket.com/albums/hh518/joshorjoshua/
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-05-2012, 03:12 AM
Post: #3
RE: 1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
(11-04-2012 09:11 PM)joshyr Wrote:  I would say nay, espescially with the pen markings on the other side. It will get a very low grade.

Thanks for your opinion Joshyr! Any other takers?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-05-2012, 10:06 AM
Post: #4
RE: 1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
I would agree with Joshyr. I have a 58 Topps All-Star Ernie Banks that I sent in to be graded. Card is nice except for an ink stamp that is on the back......came back a "2". Any writing, etc on the card is considered a major flaw.

[Image: 100_2361.jpg]
[Image: 100_2362.jpg]

Always trading for Barry Larkin. Currently have 1834 different out of 3579 total cards.

Will trade for other Cincinnati Reds and Cincinnati Bengals

Photobucket http://s615.photobucket.com/albums/tt240/7WhoDey
[Image: 7whodey.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-05-2012, 06:22 PM (This post was last modified: 11-05-2012 06:24 PM by bfair32.)
Post: #5
RE: 1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
Gotcha! So no truth to some random dialog I've been reading where some folks say that ink marks will only decrease value by 2 points? Crap! I did pay $30 for the card unfortunately. I think I've taken a hit on it. Probably make that first amateur mistake, my last. Wink
Thank btw 7Whodey for the image. Its interesting to see examples!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-10-2012, 08:29 AM
Post: #6
RE: 1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
(11-05-2012 06:22 PM)bfair32 Wrote:  Gotcha! So no truth to some random dialog I've been reading where some folks say that ink marks will only decrease value by 2 points? Crap! I did pay $30 for the card unfortunately. I think I've taken a hit on it. Probably make that first amateur mistake, my last. Wink
Thank btw 7Whodey for the image. Its interesting to see examples!

Ÿøû do not want to get a card like this graded. Usually it only makes sense for extremely valuable and/or high-grade cards that will grade a 7 or 8. This card is worth as much or more ungraded.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-13-2012, 12:24 PM
Post: #7
RE: 1968 Topps Pete Rose / Grade or not?
If this is a PC card that you would like to display and protect, even with the ink stamp, a suggestion could be to use on of the "low end" cheap mass grading companies (ie GMA or the like for $2) just to have it in a slab. Some companies have slab only options also. If you were looking to flip or don't want the display option then I wouldn't.

[Image: 1WFtDI1.png]
Building Base sets and Collecting Tigers
Looking for 1951 Red Backs, 1977, 1978 and 1979, 1981, 1985 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball
Justin Verlander, Reno Bertoia, and Alan Trammell
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)