The world's most trusted source in collecting
(10-08-2012 08:16 PM)warcraftin Wrote: I know it cost more money but go BGS 9.5's they will be worth the money you spend forever even if it means your only acquiring 1 every 6 months.
My opinion is that BGS > PSA
(10-08-2012 09:22 PM)branesergen Wrote: I prefer BGS tho the PSA registry is awesome I prefer the cases of BGS. I would also vote 8.5's as well. I have Montana and Rice 8's and they are beautiful. The "Newer" ones - Aikman, Emmitt, Barry I have 9's and wouldnt really go lower. As for Marino and Elway I have 8.5's and 9's so I'm happy lol I too studied the pros and cons of both for months before I started submitting to BGS and had to decide based of cases and the .5's lol I prefer a BGS 8.5 as opposed to a PSA 8. Eventually BGS will have its registry working tho it will take years to become as much fun and challenging as PSA's.
(10-08-2012 09:09 PM)slotman11 Wrote: Hell, I would be happy to own 9's of those legends from 1981, 1984, and 1986... That is pretty old to have a mint grade from packs... don't you think??? reading a bunch about PSA and BGS... Its hurting my head... 80's and up is not vintage, but I know they are older... I looked at the PSA registry, very nice... We will see...
(10-08-2012 09:37 PM)chads-cards Wrote: PSA does do half grades as well