The world's most trusted source in collecting
(10-05-2012 09:32 PM)kevinr Wrote: Thanks buck, yea I was very pleased with my grades on the fleer especially since they were rookies. Yea it's sad that someone on here would pass something along like that, but I will give the benefit of doubt and say hopefully they didn't know before trading. I sure like the looks of the card though. If I called Beckett do you think they could tell me why they thought it was questionable?
(10-06-2012 04:16 PM)jpleazme805 Wrote: Wasn't there another MJ 1998-99 jersey card, that was on ebay a few months ago.. that had a fake patch? seems like more & more of those are showing up...
also, anybody remember when half logoman patches were first shown on cards? I don't think it was 1998... I thought logoman half patches was more recently... like last 5-6 years...
I questioned a lot of UD Artifacts cards, where there were two players on the card. one would show a jersey, while the other had a half logoman patch.. it doesn't look right, when one is a logoman, while the other is only a jersey..
no, back to the subject of this thread... I liked the cards you sent in. I would not of sent in that MJ hologram card, without looking very closely under bright LED light.. I have 3-4 of that card. The surface on all of them are very poor... I'd probably get a BGS 2-3 on mine..
a few other cards, I would of passed up too, only because of the low dollar value.. but it is the collector's preference. Your cards do look good!! for me, I can not afford to send cards to get graded, I'd rather buy more singles, since I am not buying boxes right now...