[Sman110]

Just curious I like Rice better myself, but I want to hear what you think.

[TangoVictorMike]

I too say ray rice. I have 3 teams where i drafted ray rice, and two of those, i took rice over foster. I hate drafting a RB(doesnt matter who it is) who'd have a backup RB who can/will steal some carries AND, a backup who probably would start on another team. Plus i like that ray rice gets a good share of targets thrown to him as well. He can catch and run.

[all day baby]

Schaub > Flacco, means your RB doesn't HAVE to carry the whole team.

Foster.

[joe callahan13]

Hmmmmm. This is a tough question. I just don't know....

[ripkenfan72]

Ray but I am opinionated Honestly I just haven't seen Foster play enough to give a good answer. We don't get too many Texans games in PA and to me numbers aren't everything!

[ftballcardz]

it doesnt matter which one you take... they are both monsters in PPR leagues. If your going strictly rushing stats, then I would go with Foster with a slight edge because his opponents defenses arent that good....Rice has to play Pitt twice, Philly and NYG once each this year.

[bostonsports1]

I have first pick in my PPR league and I am taking Rice.

[sconnienation3]

Rice. Foster is just too fragile in my mind. And Ben Tate will get plenty of carries as well.

[chevy man 22]

yeah I agree Foster has little chance to make it the whole season without missing multiple games. Rice to my knowledge has never missed a game and he's a workhorse.

[Sman110]

Thanks everyone!