[krykslr]

Just looking for opinions on this...

I have the opportunity to pick up a 1954 Topps Aaron RC at a good price, but it's graded by BVG, and I know that's not really the ideal company. If I picked it up, would it be worth it to re-submit to PSA or SGC?

[rybowski97]

for sure... BVG for whatever reason is very trusted among vintage collectors. if its a card for your pc, then i say really its up to you. if you are never gonna re sell it then doesnt matter who graded it.

[chads-cards]

I have a cardinal rule of psa for vintage

[ricelynnevans75]

If it's for your PC, then just go with whatever company you are most comfortable with.

If it's for resale, I'd go with PSA.

[alfredoleal2001]

Personally I like the BVG holders better, for some reason the cards move around in the PSA holders.

[75toppsfan]

(07-15-2012 12:50 PM)alfredoleal2001 Wrote:  Personally I like the BVG holders better, for some reason the cards move around in the PSA holders.

Yeah most of them do wiggle around. I'm not an authority or anything, but all my graded cards are PSA except a handful.I think they do a good job grading vintage. Every once in awhile though, you'll see one that the grading doesnt seem accurate. But thats with any grading company I think.

[reido918]

After seeing and reading about the Dmitri Young collection, I do not trust PSA to grade anything. I'd stay with the BVG or resubmit to SGC. I personally like the BVG slabs.