[totally sports]

Just going through some stuff and found this, is it considered an error or just a common misprint?

[rogue655]

And it looks like ronnie brown's sig

[jacobystealshome]

just a wrong back. printing flaw, not an error

[ZeroDave]

(05-31-2012 05:26 PM)jacobystealshome Wrote:  just a wrong back. printing flaw, not an error

I would say its an error and not a flaw. As an error is a deviation from accuracy or correctness.

[rogue655]

either they both have the same signature or they used Ronnie browns

[totally sports]

(05-31-2012 05:57 PM)rogue655 Wrote:   either they both have the same signature or they used Ronnie browns

My word it looks like it, its a facsimile not autographed. Funny thing though I also have the correct one and it looks just like that too.

[jacobystealshome]

(05-31-2012 05:47 PM)ZeroDave Wrote:  I would say its an error and not a flaw. As an error is a deviation from accuracy or correctness.

a wrong back in this hobby is considered a printing flaw, not an error

[djohn]

(05-31-2012 05:47 PM)ZeroDave Wrote:  I would say its an error and not a flaw. As an error is a deviation from accuracy or correctness.

Technically, it is a printing error. However unless they made a bunch of this card with that error it will not be considered an error card and will simply be considered a wrong-back.

[all day baby]

(05-31-2012 06:27 PM)totally sports Wrote:  My word it looks like it, its a facsimile not autographed. Funny thing though I also have the correct one and it looks just like that too.

That year Topps had fascimile autos on them. That being said, that card is truly one of the most messed up cards I have ever seen... wrong back, wrong auto, wrong, wrong, wrong!

[slotman11]

pretty cool...