The world's most trusted source in collecting
(03-24-2012 05:39 PM)tperks76 Wrote: The narrow borders are a dead giveaway, unless its been trimmed
(03-25-2012 07:03 PM)jchavestx Wrote: Also the narrow borders does not apply to the 1996 Fleer reprints, in fact their borders are slightly larger than the original.
(03-26-2012 09:43 AM)got watcha want Wrote: I would compare this MJ RC to the graded versions you have Scott......
You know they are authentic and when you compare them if the posts on this thread have merit when comparing then I bet you have a fake. It is really hard to be 100% on a picture alone.
I haven't read the links to the counterfiet guides that some have posted.... but I personally don't like the placement of the tradmark logo on the back of the card..... the thing that helped me find a legit one to send for grading was the eyes of the bull in the team logo on the back as well.
The trademark logo needs to have a better contrast and should be sharper, the eyes of the bull should have a small pupil and be smaller and more visible compared to the bigger pupil that I "THINK" I can see in the scan. Again it is hard to tell from pics on a screen, instead of having in hand.
If you compare those logos or if the boarders are too small or the colors are too bright when comparing this one to the graded versions, then you know the answer. If you are still not sure, either send it off for grading or move it cheaper with a warning or gaurantee maybe???