[ryancholden]

Just what the subject says. Which do you prefer, and briefly why?

[filamuraireborn]

I prefer legible on-card autos and it must be a full autograph and not the initial auto type. If the signer is old and is having difficulty in signing, legible autograph is not an issue.

[randall617]

On card autos definitely. 99% of the GU swatches are one color, sometimes not even the team's color from the player on the card. The autos are more personal is why I like them.

[Merovius]

Low #'ed on card autos w/certification.

I like game used but there has just been far too much surreptitious behavior/scandals with suppliers.

I especially hate cards like Tribute Gu that say "This relic is not from any specific game or event". Great so wtf am I holding exactly, a towel, a bench, Jordany Valdespin's Port St Lucie road greys? ....

With the auto you pretty much know what youre getting.

[filamuraireborn]

(03-16-2012 01:49 PM)Merovius Wrote:  Low #'ed on card autos w/certification.

Plus one on the certified auto and I also like any authenticated auto. Sequentially numbered on-card auto is not much of my taste. High or low or even 1/1. Also, any in-person auto that I may get personally is one of the best thing to prefer or like or love about autographs.

[elfeo013]

on card auto!

[Krangry]

Ive been collecting on BALL autos more then cards even recently . I like patch cards, and earlier gu cards of hofers that actually say gu bat or jersey etc.

[PadresFan86]

I prefer game used on card autos

[filamuraireborn]

(03-16-2012 03:57 PM)PadresFan86 Wrote:  I prefer game used on card autos

game-used or on-card autographs

[0mattinglyalexander0]

I've been over "game used" for a long time unless I need them for a set. Don't trust them.