[lilgman]

Was looking at this card and then looked up cert # and appears accurate, but card doesn't quite look like an 8....maybe just scan. Let me know opinions.


http://www.ebay.com/itm/1948-Johnny-Mize...337146bf3c

[rwtzero]

I find PSA to be too inconsistent with their grading. I looked at three cards last night, one with a qualifier (OC), one with (MC) and one with nothing. The one with the (OC) was the worst card, it should have got the (MC)! and the one without a qualifier was DEFINATELY worse than the (MC), and should have at least got a (OC),,, go figure.

Either way, that card looks nice to me. Great eye appeal and thats all that matters to me as a collector.

[beatles guy]

(02-02-2012 01:37 AM)rwtzero Wrote:  I find PSA to be too inconsistent with their grading. I looked at three cards last night, one with a qualifier (OC), one with (MC) and one with nothing. The one with the (OC) was the worst card, it should have got the (MC)! and the one without a qualifier was DEFINATELY worse than the (MC), and should have at least got a (OC),,, go figure.

Either way, that card looks nice to me. Great eye appeal and thats all that matters to me as a collector.

Ditto. I've seen PSA give 4's and 5's on cards with paper loss.