[trince]

Is there anyway to duplicate more than one item at a time?
Having to duplicate half a set one card at a time is very tedious and slow.

[mannyman18]

(08-09-2011 04:55 AM)trince Wrote:  Is there anyway to duplicate more than one item at a time?
Having to duplicate half a set one card at a time is very tedious and slow.

They really don't want people to use the duplicate function, unless they really need to. What they do encourage is having extra tags on the card to indicate where you have the card. This is a real pain in the butt if you ask me, ask i build sets and have cards that i put into "Sets" and other cards that I leave as singles and i like to seperate the two.

If anyone has a better idea please feel free to express it.

[jace375]

No..I have the same frustrations...haven't figured out any shortcuts or workarounds.

[trince]

(08-09-2011 06:23 AM)mannyman18 Wrote:  They really don't want people to use the duplicate function, unless they really need to. What they do encourage is having extra tags on the card to indicate where you have the card. This is a real pain in the butt if you ask me, ask i build sets and have cards that i put into "Sets" and other cards that I leave as singles and i like to separate the two.

If anyone has a better idea please feel free to express it.

This is the main reason I would like to duplicate multiple cards, to add sets. I don't understand why they don't have a +1 function or something that would allow a collector to add a complete set or large chunks of sets to a collection (or even better keep sets separate from singles). I made a suggestion that they allow us to have an extra account attached to our main account for sets only (ie for me a trince_sets account) but I am sure that was ignored. I can't believe they would be ignorant to collectors picking up complete sets and wanting to add them to what they already have. Adding one to each item one at a time is ridiculous. This has been an oversight in the old system as well as this one. I made suggestions several times on the old system that this be addressed on the new but, again, it was obviously ignored. Must not be enough people adding sets...