ie new member, jr. member, etc.
thanks
thanks
DO NOT TRADE: Richard Albers
OT: What determines your member status?
|
ie new member, jr. member, etc.
thanks DO NOT TRADE: Richard Albers
I have been wondering, too. What makes you a super member and all that lol
See my bucket organized by sport and then by player or team: http://s174.photobucket.com/user/thump17er/library/Basketball%20Scans?sort=6&page=1 (07-05-2011, 10:59 PM)mrhurtado17 Wrote: I have been wondering, too. What makes you a super member and all that lolTo become a SR Member you need to have 2500 post's on the boards, The rest oif them are also determined by the number of posts a person makes. Super Member is for MODS and STAff. Head Jedi Warrior or whatever is for the idiot that came up with the determining member status by amount of posts. LOL
ok, gotcha. so its all based on post #s? not trades or time on the site?
thanks!!! DO NOT TRADE: Richard Albers
I thought it was trades good to know I guess.
Derek Jeter Collector from 1992-1996. 305 out of 306 99% complete.
1450/1919 1990's Jeter cards 76% (07-05-2011, 11:12 PM)spitjean Wrote: ok, gotcha. so its all based on post #s? not trades or time on the site?On this new site they went back to the old way of doing things, from like 2002 whatever, and they go by number of post. On the BETA site you got points for each trade for each feedback left and received, for uploading scans of cards, for making post's, starting threads, etc.... and you had to get so many points to move up to different ranks. Basically though, the member status titles, mean absolutely nothing, since anyone can make posts, I personally feel they should go by trader rating, for example, if someone has a 5 Rating in their feedback, then they get a 5* rating, 4.98 Feedback, then a 4.98* Rating, it would really make it a lot easier to know who to deal with when trading.
Do you know what the breakdown is?
I'm pretty sure when you get 100 you go from New to Jr.
Collecting Reds and A's (especially Joey Votto, Bronson Arroyo, and Josh Reddick)
i haven't been on a year yet and im a senior member....seems weird. I make alot of trades, but if posting is the only thing that determines it then all that means is i have way to much to say lol. Number of posts seems like a silly way to rank members.
"rank" on a website is pretty silly period, no matter how it is calculated.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|