(06-29-2011 09:57 AM)thelegendjerryrice Wrote: Didn't I see a post like the other day. How Beckett explained the whole RC thing. Maybe I read it wrong. But parallels aren't considered RC's either.
Taken right from the listing in Beckett.
1996 Circa #65 Derek Jeter
1993 Topps #98 Derek Jeter RC
(06-29-2011 10:58 AM)arod1973 Wrote: The rookie card issue is one that is still heavily debated by alot of people and has more recently been debated because of Bowman prospect releases and the whole Rookie Card Logo instituted by MLB.
Personally I feel the 1990s were an easy time as far as Rookie cards as Bowman wasn't around clouding the issue...
As far as I'm concerned 1993 cards are Jeter's rookies as they were the first liscensed cards produced by a major card company and prices would reflect that as a 1993 Jeter sells for more than a 1994 and so on.
(08-06-2014 11:33 AM)jaykayzee Wrote: Don't confuse "not valuable" with "not collectible".