[gizmoto1987]

I just recieved my cards back from Beckett today. This was my very first submission so concidering that, I think I did pretty well. I might resubmit the Al Horford Box Set auto it's .5 away from being Gem Mint (& to me seems flawless).

I was really happy with my overall results. The one exception being the Joakim Noah Exquisite Numbers Pieces being deemed authentic altered (for not meeting the minimum width required) on closer inspection it is short of 2.5" although it doesn't appear to be trimmed,doctored, or altered by someone after manufacturing. I think it may have just slipped past Upper Deck a little short of the 2.5", with Exquisite being hand coalated and all.

Let me know what you think. Also the Horford Finest, 2 Joakim Noah Box Set autos, Joakim Noah SPX 9.0 w/10 auto are for sale.

[htowntigger]

Whoa, congrats, you did really well! Anytime you get BGS 9s and higher, you did really good. Exquisite is a tough grade, 8.5 in Exquisite is really good, these are tough to get a good grade on because they are thick cards.

[filamuraireborn]

Congratulations!

What is the alteration on the other Exquisite Noah?

[gizmoto1987]

(05-13-2011 08:14 AM)filamuraireborn Wrote:  Congratulations!

What is the alteration on the other Exquisite Noah?

It came up short by a milimeter or so of what Beckett alows on width, just short of 2.5". I truely believe it was cut short in error by UD as it doesn't appear trimmed or "altered".

I should have seen this before I sent it in, as it does in fact look off center/short on width when you look at the UD logo at the top right.

[deuce6000]

That's great nothing under a 9 besides the altered but what are ya gonna do right.