[foleylion08]

THE GREAT 48 Wrote:

THE GREAT 48 Wrote:

foleylion08 Wrote:For instance I like stats and super bowls. some people don't, I do and therefore my best ever will be different than yours. If peyton doesn't win another super bowl before he retires I will not count him as the best ever. I do not care what kind of numbers he puts up. $0

$0Oh...so you think Emitt is the best RB ever not Barry, cause Emitt has the "stats, & Super bowls"?$0$0$0

$0Bump for foleylion08's response.....

This is a TOTALLY different argument. For QBs I look at Super Bowls because you are supposed to be the team leader and lead your team to a superbowl. RBs don't have that much control over the game. Even if a team is completely balanced 50/50 run/pass the qb gets his hands on 100% of the snaps, not counting wildcat of course. And yes for stats, I'll take Barry's stats before Emmitts ANYDAY. because you can't look at totals when one plays for so much longer than the other, you have to look at averages and barry averages over 200 more yards per season than Emmitt. and Barry also did not have a fb or the offensive line, or the other superstars on his team. It's like comparing apples to oranges when talking about best RBs and QBs. And with sundays win, Brady is now 8-4 in heads up games with Peyton Manning. And my stat for that game is Patriots turnovers = 0 Manning's turnovers = 3. Brady didn't pass for as many yards or tds, but he played smart and didn't try to force anything. $0