[evolb909]

So, none of this stuff people posted scans of is going on the main post I guess?  Even with all of this visual proof, Beckett still REFUSES to acknowledge these true variations. It's mind-boggling!  This is one of the most viewed threads on this site, so it's pretty obvious many people are interested in them. Yeah, they're from late 80's and early 90's sets. Does Beckett have something against adding value to these sets or what?  It's officially hopeless, I give up.