[giantfan270]

(04-24-2012 03:43 PM)ricelynnevans75 Wrote:  Evidence doesn't matter when you run a BGS group submission on the football boards and make a little money on the side doing it. (Nothing wrong with that IMO for the work involved)

---

Point 2-I know of at least one person who you submitted a card for that the card was a PSA 10 and it came back a BGS 9.5. Heck, even nolan5000 has stated that he's had decent success in crossing over. To say you've never received the same grade from BGS is just silly, and obviously a lie.

Point 3-Exactly, it's an opinion, just like I have my grading company of choice due to their consistency in grading and the way the cards look in the holder. Each of the big three has their positives and negatives, while each has made and will continue to make errors. It is human beings after all doing the grading.

Nobody has yet to prove that one is better than the others. On this site, your going to have BGS fans say BGS is best. On PSA and SGC boards, your going to have people saying that the respective company is best. Which is better and why? Because someone says so? Sorry, opinions do not equal fact. If they did, my job would be a heck of a lot easier.

Well, because of my group submissions I submitted over 600 cards for grading last year and 300 the year before. I think that gives me some experience when it comes to submitting crossovers. And yes, the card that was a PSA 10, came back a BGS 9.5. Like I said, not equal, lower. I don't understand the point your trying to make. I have never submitted a PSA card to be re-graded by BGS, that came back with the same PSA grade or higher. The BGS grade is always lower. Always. You will never be able to prove the contrary. I don't do vintage, but the FACT is; my PSA cards get lower grades at BGS. Which is fine with me. I can't argue with what actually happens. It is, what it is.