(02-07-2012 09:56 AM)nolan5000 Wrote: Oh, ok. I didn't explain myself very well. What I meant by my comment was that there may be issues that we don't see that need to be done that take priority over the registry. There may be issues that need to be taken care of in order for the registry to even function. That's what I meant.
Sorry for the misunderstanding that I've caused.
(02-07-2012 08:34 PM)tiger8mush2 Wrote: they can take 5 mins and tell us SOMETHING.
"Hi valued customers, we want to get the registry going but we've got other problems and foresee a summer 2012 timeline for registry"
They could hire ONE geeky database guy and have a BRAND NEW registry launched in a few months and then pay a high school kid $10/hr to key punch the legacy data into the new system and be done faster than this. This is pathetic.